I read this most spectacular article in Entertainment Weekly this week that suggests that a "Gilmore Girls" movie isn't completely out of the realm of possibility...now that would be fun, wouldn't it?
As a fan of all things Lorelai and Rory, I also couldn't help but wonder how the show would've ended if G.G. creator Amy Sherman-Palladino had written it instead. My guess is that Rory wouldn't have been working as a stringer for Barack Obama...but hey, now that he's our president, at least there would be plenty for her to write about, right?
But of course what everyone is really wondering is would she still be with Logan? Seriously, the mind reels...
(Incidentally, I'm going with "no," I never really liked the guy...way too smug).
Oh my gosh! That would be so awesome! Gilmore Girls was the absolute best. Loved that show. *sigh* I too, have often wondered how differently it would have ended if Amy hadn't left. Rory would definitely not have stayed with Logan. She's way too good for him. I like to think she and Marty would have gotten together. Luke and Lorelai would have gotten married, of course, and had a baby, most likely a boy. It'd be hard for any little girl to compete with big sister Rory. ;o)
Posted by: Christiana | November 19, 2009 at 10:24 PM
Okay, I've been a silent reader of your blog for a little while, but I just couldn't pass up commenting on this. I love Gilmore Girls and hope the movie possibly is true! Logan was cute but too pretentious. I was always a fan of Jess, even though he was trouble with a capital T.
Posted by: Butterflies | November 20, 2009 at 11:21 PM
I totally agree...a little boy for Luke and Lorelai would be just adorable. :) And Butterflies, I'm so glad you've been reading all this time. :) Thanks so much for you comment, and I'm right there with you, I thought Jess and Rory were adorable together, even though you knew it could never last.:)
Posted by: Christa | November 22, 2009 at 09:04 AM